Jelly_Sheffield
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so.
- Messages
- 706
- Location
- Sheffield, UK
From my perspective inkjets are still the inferior choice for a main printer:That's a 1990's view of inkjets to be frank. The output quality is not discernible from laser these days, it can even be better on the photo quality ones. I have a Kyocera MFP, colour laser which is a proper office quality machine. I also have an Epson Ecotank aimed at home users. Same paper, same results, very different cost.
In the 90's I tried one of the first Canon Bubblejets and would agree they were terrible. Now though, often better than laser.
- they're still way slower,
- much more expensive per page, and
- they just don't last as long in terms of service life, offsetting the cheaper upfront cost.
Laser also has the advantage that it won't run if the prints get wet like inkjet, which a big practical advantage for printing labels or documents.
We have a Brother inkjet for when we need colour printing in my partner's office, and a HP B&W laserjet in mine, the laser gets used most days, the inkjet maybe every six months...
It being quicker for her to do a network print to my office, and walk through to pick it up, than to wait for the printer on her desk.
The performance is impressive, but they need to be used regularly or the print heads (which are expensive and separate) can give up the ghost rapidly.Oh, and look at the tech in CAD quality A0 plotters, yes, inkjet.
I gave mine away in the end to a friend who prints posters and other large format stuff as a side-business... They're using it several times a week and it's been fine for them, I used it a couple of times a month and it was unreliable and time consuming.