chevy2
Member
- Messages
- 1,631
- Location
- Herts.
Fair comment, i realise its about surface speed travelled for a particular diameter,Sorry! Can't let that pass. It is all about tip speeds and by the time the 9" disc is worn down enough to fit in a smaller grinder, the reduced diameter has a similar, or lower tip speed than the 9" grinder, so quite safe. Been using them for over 30yrs without a prob. It is all about centrifugal loads, which go up by a square of the RPM.
imagine a scenario "if" a 9" disc thats now a small diameter disc was to explode in a 4.5" grinder and the health & safety guys investigate it would be classed as negligence for fitting a disc that is "marked" for use in a lower rpm machine,
They'll simply photogragh the machine and rpm and also the disc and max rpm = guilty.