It will, you just need carbide cutters. I have turned HSS blanks into swarf easy. I needed accurate angles for a TR2 threading tool so turned it.
Good drawings. Looks easy enough to copy.
the more i look at the spindle nose on page one the more i'm convinced the ring is a seperate piece maybe it''s just a shadow i'm only looking at a pic so i'll shut up
Whats a generic ER collet holder.?Bit drastic, a generic ER collet holder could be adapted to fit the existing spindle and a drawbar made to hold it in place.
Whats a generic
Whats a generic ER collet holder.?
I think what Penfold was suggesting was to take something like this.>Whats a generic
Whats a generic ER collet holder.?
As a new ER collet holder would only need to be ground to suit the rear of the existing taper it shouldnt add much more than around 60mm to the overall length.Remembering that you have to fit the new collet holder spindle into the the existing spindle before you even add the clamp and toolbit. The less than generous headroom of this machine means you'd end up with an engraving machine with six inches of stick out on the bit in a holder modified to fit a precision part.
My problem is I dont have money for a Bridgeport. I am trying to get this mark II cutting to see if milling is actually for me.You know, any old standard type. Not a specific type for an obsolete machine.
ER32 is a standard size taper collet system into which you can fit any ER32 collet in a range of sizes up to the maximum that system will accept. With the George Taylor, that size is limited by the physical dimension of the spindle even if you modify it to fit.
Spindle is the very heart of the machine and is a beautifully accurate component you really don't want to be trying to reproduce. So err, I gave up and bought a Bridgeport!
My problem is I dont have money for a Bridgeport. I am trying to get this mark II cutting to see if milling is actually for me.
Mine already has a draw bar fitted...Neither do I but I managed to pick up a slightly broken one for cheap. It's still slightly broken but in a lot more pieces!
I never did measure the precise taper inside the quill/spindle. I don't think I did. I know the measurements I put up in those diagrams are spot on but in hindsight, wonder if you might get lucky and be able to use a drawbar collet with the "incorrect" taper. On mine an additional problem was someone had welded a drive sprocket to the top of the spindle, ruining the inside bore.
What are you going to do as a drive solution?
I managed to pick up a slightly broken one for cheap. It's still slightly broken but in a lot more pieces!
I think mine is but can't remember now.. Lolmine was a belt drive with a huge pulley on the spindle
iff the quill has a taper and hollow right through then a draw bar can be used on tooling..just need to find out the taper form ie,MT2 or MT3 R8 ect. Looks like a very rigid machine for its size,far more capable than say a Dore westbury or something.
Mine was hollow but has a different taper.Sadly I fear the quill is a single piece which includes the collet chuck. I may whip it off later for a looksee.
That is my plan as the speed of the feed depends on the speed of the cutter....Incredibly, this old machine does have power feed to the table. You can see it in the back and white image above. Probably drive that with a separate motor tbh.