Hi
I also would say it looks like the weld has just been worn away, is it being dragged across sand beds ?
If so it is down to poor design, if it is being dragged in that direction a curved edge would work better.
Thanks Vpug
Pretty much all been said... pics are not really high enough resolution to zoom in properly but looks to me like a partial pen weld which has been completely worn away well into the parent metal (green circle for example). Zoom in on the area circled in red and it looks like the origional cut edge is still visible
As everyone else said a full pen weld will last longer, welding the inside will increase life further etc
Yep 316 is commonly known as marine grade but it's being worn out not failing due to corrosion
Without a full penetration joint or the joint being welded from both sides and degree of flexing in the component will cause the weld to crack from the inside, the joint needs to be reiforced on the inside either by a weld of some form of gussett.
From what I can see the original deposited weld looks OK and if your contractor has done what you asked him to you cannot really blame him, suggest the best course maybe to get round the table with him and discuss ways the product design could be improved to avoid further failures
I cant see it properly but all the pics seem to show very straight lines of weld or of failure. More often than not this means that it has never been welded properly in the first place. In other words lack of fusion or lack of pen or poor design.
A weld isnt straight, even a robotic weld so if the weld has become an integral part of the structure (ie fully fused) any failure will occur along the weakest points which is very rarely a straight line.
Ive been looking at weld failures for 40 odd years and hardly ever seen a crack, more often than not it was never welded in the first place.