eLuSiVeMiTe
Member
- Messages
- 16,441
- Location
- ......
And getting rid of private air travel will too.Sorting this out will do more for the world than half the population nipping to the shops and a local commute in an electric vehicle.
And getting rid of private air travel will too.Sorting this out will do more for the world than half the population nipping to the shops and a local commute in an electric vehicle.
What are example of private air travel?And getting rid of private air travel will too.
To be fair, I don't think anyone has ever claimed an EV would solve all problems, but there's plenty of evidence to suggest they are an improvement on ICE, at least in terms of overall emissions, which is surely all they could ever be?Neither like nor dislike.
Just don't agree they are going to solve all our problems.
For eg. The many millions of people commuting to work everyday.
London. Why did we never decentralise and spread out around the country.
Haulage. M1 northbound this afternoon. 2 lanes front to back with HGV trunking up the country.
Instead of HS2 so people don't have to have a zoom meeting why not expand and develop a rail network to get more trucks off the roads.
Air travel.
Private air travel....
Shipping most of what we need halfway around the world to exploit cheap labour.
So if you bought a plane for yourself you shouldn't be able to fly it? Should they stop making little planes?
I don't have a problem, in fact I would like to own one. I was just answering your question of private air travelSo if you bought a plane for yourself you shouldn't be able to fly it? Should they stop making little planes?
Could they make those electric?
I have no problem in people having hobbies. I wouldn't begrudge people flying their planes for no profit with slight damage to the environment. Even though I have no desire to fly whatsoever. But if flyings your thing then go fourth.I don't have a problem, in fact I would like to own one. I was just answering your question of private air travel
All sounds good except what will the other half of the world do to earn a crust if we are not buying their cheap throw away junk and have it shipped 1/2 way around the world. It's all a merry go round and what happens when the "main bearing " fails?Sorting this out will do more for the world than half the population nipping to the shops and a local commute in an electric vehicle.
Farm wheat and bake bread?All sounds good except what will the other half of the world do to earn a crust
Exactly. No one thinks this will solve all the problems. No one thing will but in the mean time we should try and improve.To be fair, I don't think anyone has ever claimed an EV would solve all problems, but there's plenty of evidence to suggest they are an improvement on ICE, at least in terms of overall emissions, which is surely all they could ever be?
A Hush up of the flaws, I think it's too early to tell. When it comes to repair scrapping and recycling. Especially regarding battery's and motors ect.
Are people going to throw away whole cars as it's cheaper to get a whole car than change/fix a battery (like in the way of tv's) a few years down the line. In say ten years or something
Other than renewables (which is making many richer) what else are the government pushing to help with pollution.To be fair, I don't think anyone has ever claimed an EV would solve all problems, but there's plenty of evidence to suggest they are an improvement on ICE, at least in terms of overall emissions, which is surely all they could ever be?
What would you like them to push? They can influence (generally by taxing or giving tax breaks) but other than that if they start banning or mandating things then they get accused of being draconian.Other than renewables (which is making many richer) what else are the government pushing to help with pollution.
And no. Pumping sewage into rivers and seas doesn't count.
Yeah, the argument that something is only x% better than the alternative and doesn't solve ALL the problems so we should just carry on as we are until some point in the future when maybe something better will appear doesn't make sense to me.Exactly. No one thinks this will solve all the problems. No one thing will but in the mean time we should try and improve.
Same as renewable energy.
What would you like them to push? They can influence (generally by taxing or giving tax breaks) but other than that if they start banning or mandating things then they get accused of being draconian.
Don't forget they also have to balance out what works economically otherwise we (as a country) end up broke. Air travel being a case in point, other than taxing it to the hilt and in the process making us uncompetitive I'm not sure what they can do? Its not that i dont agree with your point as ive not been on an abroad holiday for over 10 years. It's not an apology for the government but that's just the way things are.
There's a lot people can do as consumers without any need for gov intervention.
Help push work from home instead of actively shutting it down.For eg. The many millions of people commuting to work everyday.
Spread out around the country. Help reduce the crazy ray race into the capitalLondon. Why did we never decentralise and spread out around the country.
See next quoteHaulage. M1 northbound this afternoon. 2 lanes front to back with HGV trunking up the country.
Instead of HS2 so people don't have to have a zoom meeting why not expand and develop a rail network to get more trucks off the roads.
Needs to be taxed globally to keep airlines competitive. Maybe into a global environment fund.Air travel.
Billionaires and millionaires need to be taxed for their overconsumption how many normal people to match some of the very wealthy s carbon footprint.Private air travel....
Again. Needs to change.Shipping most of what we need halfway around the world to exploit cheap labour.
Could be legislated that if working from home is deemed viable for an employee them it can't be refused.It’s hard not to disagree with all that, but I’m not sure the government have any say in if companies want their staff to work from home? I think there’s some tax breaks and cycle to work schemes, I’m fortunate that I do mainly work from home anyway but I’m not sure what was implemented during lockdown and if anything had been removed after?
Kinda what cops for isn't it.As for air travel, again I’m not disagreeing but what, realistically, can they (as in our government) do? Globally it makes sense because then one country wouldn’t be disadvantaged against another but back in the real world I can’t see that happening…
Again. Let's reinstate some Victorian technology and get trains trunking and more trucks off the motorways.HGV’s - ok, they should stop people buying stuff. Whoever implements that won’t be getting in for another term.
Working from home can't be refused? I reckon that would be a bone of contention for employers and employees? Who gets to decide, if it suits the employer does the employee get any say or are they forced to work from their home while the employer gets to shut down their office? I could see that being a complete minefield to be honest...Could be legislated that if working from home is deemed viable for an employee them it can't be refused.
Kinda what cops for isn't it.
Truth is they don't want to do anything that will hurt revenues for them and their ilk.
Again. Let's reinstate some Victorian technology and get trains trunking and more trucks off the motorways.
More use than a hs link to Manchester.
It's all about keeping money trickling up from where I sit.
fossil fuel electricity is the same price as nuclearRenewables still doing very badly. 70% of Britain's electricity again coming from expensive fossil fuels.
Been like this for the last few days - wind has picked up a tiny bit - was almost zero for quite some time. Solar down to about 10% of summer values even on a sunny day this time of year.
Notice we are importing as much as we can off other countries as well.
View attachment 375050