Hikvision cctv security risk

[gaz1]

It's weird that with the sound as I was under the impression that CCTV with audio recording wasn't allowed in the UK, Big Biz vs government laws ay

Stu

you can use sound but its such a grey area

ive used it with cctv within a court room if they are dumb enough to say each others names whilst there doing damage thats there own problem

its caught neighbours causing trouble goarding and also intimidation
its proved that the neighbour was telling lies by accusations of assault and also threatening behavior then claiming wolf and stating that ive stated all of the above
you should see the police's face when video evidence is shown to them that there time has been wasted and the accuser of the allegations was the culprit

you cant cry wolf and use old age and intimidation tactics to claim various allegations so you can claim much more
didnt expect to get so burnt by someone

 

[Dev]

You can record with audio, it does not have to be alarm activated.

 

[Dev]

People the Guardian website gives your data to. It places cookies on your device that last for between 3 months and a year.

Thats not them all - you can only attach 10 images

They have a bit of a cheek talking about privacy

 

[Stupoty]

People the Guardian website gives your data to. It places cookies on your device that last for between 3 months and a year.

Thats not them all - you can only attach 10 images

They have a bit of a cheek talking about privacy

Whilst people like to data mine the cookies it is a little different to no holds barred infringement on your privacy and they have provided an option to turn them off.
It's kind of like you have something against the papers , I only posted the article from the guardian as I thought there wouldn't be such visceral triggered responses as I might get if I posted the same article that was printed in the daily viz or the mirror.

I wasn't trying to hold the guardian up as a beacon of freedom and egalitarian thought or nothing.


Stu

 

[Scalarocco]

It tickles me when websites have the annoying pop up claiming to value your privacy, when the evidence points to the opposite. I hate having to jump through hoops rejecting them all, even if there is a button saying "reject all". The one that grinds my gears the most is the tab titled "legitimate interest". Legitimate by whos measure? Not mine! Again, jump through the reject hoops we go, as they are not covered by the reject all button. Sneaky, huh?!

 

[Dev]

What they’re saying is;
Give private companies your personal information, for free, so they can profit from it.
Don’t help the authorities tasked with finding who burgled your neighbours.

I disagree.

 

[Stupoty]

the authorities tasked with finding who burgled your neighbours.

Well they do need a bit of help with that for sure.

Burglars go unpunished with only 5% of cases solved

The percentage of solved burglaries has nearly halved in seven years across England and Wales, and in some areas fewer than one in 30 crimes are reaching court

www.thetimes.co.uk

Stu

 

[brightspark]

theres fewer burglarys acording to figures no most people are p.issed off and not reporting it because its a waste of time

 

[gaz1]

It tickles me when websites have the annoying pop up claiming to value your privacy, when the evidence points to the opposite. I hate having to jump through hoops rejecting them all, even if there is a button saying "reject all". The one that grinds my gears the most is the tab titled "legitimate interest". Legitimate by whos measure? Not mine! Again, jump through the reject hoops we go, as they are not covered by the reject all button. Sneaky, huh?!

id rather have that reject button than have to click on all of the buttons to reject all

most of the time i just close the site off as not worth bothering with

the worst sites are the ones that you have to click each one and the very naughty sites that dont give you much options as they dont care on your objection