Hmmm, I am not sure.... I did not expect that either! I thought the error would still be there, implying that it was a false error and did not depend on the physical device.
Theoretically, it means the shunt really is faulty. I assume that you have had it loose in your hand and checked for fractures. You probably would need an accurate meter to check the resistance ( a few milliOhms? ), and we don't know what it should be.
Not knowing what assumptions the programmer made in his logic flow, there could still be a communication error, giving a "null" result now. Try power-up with a direct short across the X7 pins of the PCB.
The machine cannot be used, because without current feedback, the inverter control will not know how hard to drive the power transistors.
Theoretically, it means the shunt really is faulty. I assume that you have had it loose in your hand and checked for fractures. You probably would need an accurate meter to check the resistance ( a few milliOhms? ), and we don't know what it should be.
Not knowing what assumptions the programmer made in his logic flow, there could still be a communication error, giving a "null" result now. Try power-up with a direct short across the X7 pins of the PCB.
The machine cannot be used, because without current feedback, the inverter control will not know how hard to drive the power transistors.