Police entering a rented property.

[ukracer]

Just looked at my rent agreement. Landlord to give 24hr written notice for wanting access for maintenance etc. Right to open immediately in case of emergency, flood, fire or electrical issues,( main distribution room for the whole site is in my unit) or if “ directed by law enforcement “

So, no harm no foul

well I am no lawyer but I would suggest a discussion on what is a legal direction or a request is in order. It could also be down to interpretation as to what an emergency is.

 

[Johnnybravo]

well I am no lawyer but I would suggest a discussion on what is a legal direction or a request is in order. It could also be down to interpretation as to what an emergency is.

Little bit of common sense goes a long way. Why would I complain if the landlord entered my unit over a weekend if there was a burst pipe in winter or some electrical fault that may burn the whole lot down? He lives next door and I trust him implicitly. How many landlords do you know that haven’t put up the rent in 25 years? ( longest tenant on the site)

 

[Dev]

So we agree then?

That doesn't change the fact that police can not generally enter a property without a warrant or without being invited just by nature of being the police.

Not really. I’d say the opposite, the majority of times police enter a property it’s without a warrant, either by invitation or the powers Gavlar mentions, among others.
Getting a warrant would be far less common I expect.

‘Come back with a warrant’ is something people say who watch too much American TV.

 

[ukracer]

Little bit of common sense goes a long way. Why would I complain if the landlord entered my unit over a weekend if there was a burst pipe in winter or some electrical fault that may burn the whole lot down? He lives next door and I trust him implicitly. How many landlords do you know that haven’t put up the rent in 25 years? ( longest tenant on the site)

I wasn't commenting on when you would or wouldn't want to allow them access, or even your specific circumstances,. It was more not using common sense but explicitly what is or not allowed within the law.

 

[TEO]

Not sure of the legalities but you had nothing to hide, they looked inside and were happy.
I'd probably leave it at that.

I think there's a principal at stake here & the authorities will often leverage people's sketchy knowledge of the law to their (the authority's) advantage.

I don't think the "if you've nothing to hide what's the problem" argument is one that should ever be used. Every exercise of power should be justified by a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing or the prevention of wrongdoing.
Fishing isn't reasonable.

 

[Ubique]

Principle.
If you're going to go full-on ECJ, then at least check the spelling.

This 'I know my rights' (which is invariably proved to be not the case) cr@p is why policing, currently by consent in the UK, is getting harder and harder. Genuine policing time is wasted justifying how / why / when questions can be asked or searches made - for example, 'stop & search' is a good preventative action in the eyes of most, it's only seen as 'whatever'-ist by those that it will catch out, them, and the pearl-clutching, hand wringing 'activists'.
IMO it's time to go back to proper policing, 'Battle of Orgreave' style, unfortunately its the only style of policing a lot of newly-welcomed inhabitants understand, anything else is seen as weak and laughed at.
So yes, i'm one of the "if you've nothing to hide what's the problem" supporters - and I've had my collar felt a few times over the years...

 

[premmington]

Principle.
If you're going to go full-on ECJ, then at least check the spelling.

This 'I know my rights' (which is invariably proved to be not the case) cr@p is why policing, currently by consent in the UK, is getting harder and harder. Genuine policing time is wasted justifying how / why / when questions can be asked or searches made - for example, 'stop & search' is a good preventative action in the eyes of most, it's only seen as 'whatever'-ist by those that it will catch out, them, and the pearl-clutching, hand wringing 'activists'.
IMO it's time to go back to proper policing, 'Battle of Orgreave' style, unfortunately its the only style of policing a lot of newly-welcomed inhabitants understand, anything else is seen as weak and laughed at.
So yes, i'm one of the "if you've nothing to hide what's the problem" supporters - and I've had my collar felt a few times over the years...

Sadly mate...

I agree with you 100% on the above.

I wish I did'nt - this is the UK.

 

[ukracer]

Principle.
If you're going to go full-on ECJ, then at least check the spelling.

This 'I know my rights' (which is invariably proved to be not the case) cr@p is why policing, currently by consent in the UK, is getting harder and harder. Genuine policing time is wasted justifying how / why / when questions can be asked or searches made - for example, 'stop & search' is a good preventative action in the eyes of most, it's only seen as 'whatever'-ist by those that it will catch out, them, and the pearl-clutching, hand wringing 'activists'.
IMO it's time to go back to proper policing, 'Battle of Orgreave' style, unfortunately its the only style of policing a lot of newly-welcomed inhabitants understand, anything else is seen as weak and laughed at.
So yes, i'm one of the "if you've nothing to hide what's the problem" supporters - and I've had my collar felt a few times over the years...

whilst I tend to agree with a bit of what you write. I am sure the battle of Orgreave was not "proper Policing" but it was in fact thugs in uniforms obeying orders from a evil dictator.

 

[ajlelectronics]

whilst I tend to agree with a bit of what you write. I am sure the battle of Orgreave was not "proper Policing" but it was in fact thugs in uniforms obeying orders from a evil dictator.

Give them a chance, they have only just taken office in Downing Street.

 

[ukracer]

Give them a chance, they have only just taken office in Downing Street.

I was thinking more like "ding dong the witch is dead" lol

 

[Ubique]

whilst I tend to agree with a bit of what you write. I am sure the battle of Orgreave was not "proper Policing" but it was in fact thugs in uniforms obeying orders from a evil dictator.

Flip that round and they were thugs in pit helmets obeying orders from an evil dictator. And their actions were responded to in kind

 

[brightspark]

have you had a look yet ?did they do any damage throw any thing around etc

if it was a house they would be looking through the nicker draws

 

[premmington]

Give them a chance, they have only just taken office in Downing Street.

Forgive - I think the miners strikes were under a Thatcher government - unless I am confused this lot is from another team - playing on the other end of the pitch - in different colours.

 

[angellonewolf]

if it was a house they would be looking through the nicker draws

sniffing the nicker drawers

 

[premmington]

Flip that round and they were thugs in pit helmets obeying orders from an evil dictator. And their actions were responded to in kind

1984 battle of orgreave

1974 were three day weeks - power strikes - as a kid I can remember Mother cooking jacket spuds in tin foil in an open fire in lounge (dripping in butter). Candles is what sticks in my mind - 1974 I was 7 - I can remember candles everywhere.

My Nan was posh she had candle stick holders - Mother used to drip molten wax on tea saucers and stick the candles to the saucer somehow!

 

[ajlelectronics]

Forgive - I think the miners strikes were under a Thatcher government - unless I am confused this lot is from another team - playing on the other end of the pitch - in different colours.

Yes, the Baroness had to handbag them.

 

[ajlelectronics]

another team - playing on the other end of the pitch - in different colours.

Same team, different colours.

 

[premmington]

Same team, different colours.

Yet again "old mate"

I wish I did not have to agree with you - but you are 100% right here.

I truly wish you were wrong - but you are not.

 

[ukracer]

Flip that round and they were thugs in pit helmets obeying orders from an evil dictator. And their actions were responded to in kind

In that case you were not there....

 

[premmington]

In that case you were not there....

I am led to believe all these years later - even with the pits closed - there are aging miners who think they are still on strike!

Almost 40 years on, the miners’ strike still casts a long shadow over UK politics today | John Harris

The pit closures seem a distant memory to many, but they have had a huge impact on our very social fabric, says Guardian columnist John Harris

www.theguardian.com

Orgreave was a coking plant not a mine....