redlig
Member
- Messages
- 3,721
- Location
- wiltshire uk
What's left of it.The fact that the aliens have invented inter-stellar travel would mean they most certainly are more intelligent than us and will probably scour us from the face of the planet
What's left of it.The fact that the aliens have invented inter-stellar travel would mean they most certainly are more intelligent than us and will probably scour us from the face of the planet
Its 1.1% and doesn't take into account indirect action such as buying all the almost straight to landfill carp from elsewhere. So other countries look worse because of our greed and irresponsible attitude.So, the UK is responsible for 1% of global pollution.
"The United Kingdom population is equivalent to 0.87% of the total world population."
Pollution per person - we are above the average - only slightly - but we are.
----------
In the year of my birth 1967 - there was 3.47 billion people on this planet
This year there is 8 billion
And by the time I die it will 10 billion.
In my short lifetime the worlds population has tripled - this is where the problem lies
Too many people consuming too much!
I honestly believe this is route cause of all the earths resource problems - too many successful breeding medium sized mammals = US
(Try getting your MP to sell that concept as a vote winner!)
Pavement hockey sticks are starting to appear . Where you open the access plate in the foot way very close to the kerb and put the handle end of the stick in the charging point that's under the cover , taking a lead to from the edge of the pavement to the charging socket on your car . Didn't discover how they stop water ingress into the socket but no doubt t it will be sorted .Bit harsh to just wipe out car ownership from anyone who lives in a high rise just because ... they live in a high rise though...? Although Sadiq is pretty much saying poor people cannot own a car if they live within the M25 so I guess he has paved the way for sweeping policies like this that remove choice from normal people.
perhaps it came from the recycled loins of a scrapped daddy car & some old Lada's .
Repeat after me : PROFIT PROFIT PROFIT etc.Maybe the producers of said tat could help by not making it?
All the fault of the buyers for being too weak of will, apparently.Repeat after me : PROFIT PROFIT PROFIT etc.
They'll only ever make what we'll buy.Maybe the producers of said tat could help by not making it?
Plus we then outsource jobs to said countries. Again not counted in the figures, but they work in air con buildings fixing our IT, and I'm not just talking about consumer IT, most larger businesses do it. The list goes on, also add the negative impact of our consumerism on deforestation, mining for ore and fuel etc. and the figure gets bigger still. The 1% is a figure pulled out of the air for the fat bloke at the end of the bar to reiterate to the easily convinced.
Weak willed as in buying for want and not need.All the fault of the buyers for being too weak of will, apparently.
Both . They will supply a demand but will also manufacture a need and then fulfill it .Whilst there are lots of things to consider they don't necessarily push our contribution percentage up, as whatever we do , the rest of Europe are doing and America is doing worse.
And then other countries are doing other things that we don't. Deforestation would be an example.
And the throw away that is a chicken and the egg situation. Do we buy it because they produce it, or do they produce it because we buy it.
You're talking here about global business. If there is a subcontractor in (say) India doing work for a (say) UK market (though it could just as easily be for any wealthy nation's market..... then ou cannot ascribe the emissions or consumption of energy in India - to the UK total - that would be mental.Plus we then outsource jobs to said countries. Again not counted in the figures, but they work in air con buildings fixing our IT, and I'm not just talking about consumer IT, most larger businesses do it. The list goes on, also add the negative impact of our consumerism on deforestation, mining for ore and fuel etc. and the figure gets bigger still. The 1% is a figure pulled out of the air for the fat bloke at the end of the bar to reiterate to the easily convinced.
Anyway, as I said before - while the narrative is "we must save the planet, so we are banning all ICE's & going all EV by 2030 to help achieve this" - but the reality shows every indication of the change resulting in a significant upturn in consumption of resources in perpetuity.
Capitalism & the consumer society & reducing your consumption and recycling, re-using, refurbishing existing equipment etc.... are wholly incompatible cultures!
What an EV does best - is make the consumer spend and consume, & feed the machine.... but gives the user a (false) feel-good factor, as they are sold on the idea that their consumption actually helps the planet instead of harms it.
Want/need are interchangeable terms, certainly when buying tools.... I think most on here are susceptible to that interchangeability.Weak willed as in buying for want and not need.
You don't think there's any sense or rationale being posted here?Blimey, you couldn't make some of this dribble up with 20 crates of ale, a bag of magic mushrooms, an enormity of superlatives and a random opinion generator. Abandon hope all who enter this thread
You don't think there's any sense or rationale being posted here?
You don't think there's any sense or rationale being posted here?