Muggins the Mug
Member
- Messages
- 231
The difference between the oxfords and mordern machines is more like the difference between an electric typewriter and a word processor.
Yes you can produce a neatly typed document on an electric type writer, but the operator has be able to spell, understand grammer, also pay attention to the page layout. Any mistakes are not easily corrected.
The word processor has a vast array of tools to make life simpler and produce many different finished results.
That's not the whole story though. If a company needs to send people on a 4 week course (say) to learn to produce good weld with an Oxford, but a one week course to get the same results with a modern inverter, as Director of the company would you spend a little more on machines and a whole lot less on training? This is exactly the reason mig welding is so popular, you can show an operator how to use the gear and get decent welds in a matter of hours as mig welding is a semi automatic process. With MMA its a skill that has to be practiced over and over to get it right, hence the rigorous coding system.
Of course the down side to all the technology is that people have less training (and skill).
This is the exact same reason I want to learn the "hard way" with rods and a cheap buzz box. If I can learn and learn well with something hard to use, then I should have very little problem with better and more expensive gear. Or is my logic flawed?
I learned to use a manual typewriter at school to pass my "O" Grade long before I ever used a proper word processor.
I'm very much a believer in learn the hard way first, then learn the shortcuts. That way you've got more experience and can cope with things and situations better than you could if you only learned the easy way, if that makes sense.
Regards,
Ian.