daleyd
Member
- Messages
- 10,169
- Location
- Wrexham, North Wales
Isn’t that very similar to saying that wind production today is “only” 1.5% (because that suits your argument) and annual figures show it’s actually about 24% over the year? Like you say, getting an unbiased opinion is rather tricky, no?Not if the "side" doesn't have a vested interest it doesn't.
There are people still left in the world without an agenda, and who form opinions based upon their own thoughts and observations.
As @DAPPH points out though - the chief difficulty now is in getting any unbiased / skewed / plain fabricated data or information.
Often the only ones with a strong idea of the reality - are those involved at a senior level in whatever it is..... and the last thing they'll do is provide unbiased, truly accurate, complete answers.
It's a bit like the info supplied earlier (sorry forget who posted) - that on the day in question Solar was providing 13.5% of the UK Energy needs.
In isolation that doesn't sound too bad... but it ought to be qualified by the fact that its only doing so when taken in a "Snapshot" of time, and that over a 24-hr period, at a UK annual average of about 10-hrs or so of Daylight - that the average contribution of Solar is very, very much less than 13.5%.
Before someone points it out - yes the Solar is active during the "busiest" period of the 24-hrs - so the impact of Solar isn't linear, so it's harder to estimate its true contribution..... but it wouldn't be unreasonable to suggest that the 13.5% snapshot probably translates to an average annual contribution of perhaps 5%???
Maybe someone has figures on annual Solar contribution (though of course we can question the veracity of the data - see above )
Edit: a quick Google suggests the consensus of annual UK Solar contribution is 4% - so it seems I wasn't far out, even 20% generous in my guesstimate .
Proves the point about cherry-picking data to "prove" an argument though (as the 13.5% figure unqualified - is very misleading)