graffian
Seer unto the end of his beard
- Messages
- 3,769
- Location
- gatwick
Many small capacity engines have cranks that are just pressed up, no nuts.
like harleys.
Many small capacity engines have cranks that are just pressed up, no nuts.
There are hundreds of cranks with tapers nearly every motorcycle, listers , vw,minis etc .A taper may hold, but you have to ask yourself why you never see a crank built up with taper-fit elements.
I totally agree re the angle I was only using morse as an example hense the 'ala morse taper' here is a couple of little pictures re roller cranks these are nutted ones but there are many many ones that are not just search for roller crank images his only prob is the possition of his join as you press the two together you may tend to bend the crank but putting a bolt through would just give it extra rigidity = safety also allowing it to be timed up perfectly.As earlier, many flywheels are on tapers, and suffer huge fluctuations. The old Minis comes too mind... And, as this is a one time assembly, why not use a shallower angle than morse. They are designed to come apart frequently, whereas the OPs is not.
There are hundreds of cranks with tapers nearly every motorcycle, listers , vw,minis etc .
I am talking with some experience, having made many competion flywheels and mods to engines etc, I made an extension to the front of a lister crank only last week it had a generator head at the rear (on a taper!) and the customer wanted a different spec generator head to run off the front, I made the ext from the hand starter dog in the same fashion as above and it runs a treat. btw The flywheel has everything to do with harmonics that is why they fit them. When the first cyl fires and is driving into the second (main) crank the one with the flywheel it will tend to tighten, when the second cyl fires the shock will be absorbed by the flywheel and it will tend to soften that shock, and as long as the drive (if any) is taken from the fly wheel end of the crank I believe there would be no problems. In my humble opinion that is how I would do it, I would NOT weld it at all because it WILL break and putting extreme heat near a crank will cause it to distort and then fret.
What about turn the ends of the cranks down say 4mm on the OD and we turn up a sleeve then press together and align and straighten and then just run round the ends of the sleeve where it joins the cranks autogenously without any filler then surface grind the center journal round and to size. We'll have the workshop for as long as we need over christmas, Andrew.
"Lightweight 6.625” diameter crankshaft assembly on larger (1.125”) diameter mainshafts. Titanium conrod running on Ina bearing on 40mm crankpin, pressed up crank assembly."
Well, a couple of us have a little experience in this area. And believe me, you'd be surprised how difficult it can be to take them apart.
Exactlly right, I did that lapping job on a cable granulating machine, flywheel taper that I made, only prob was the shaft was 600 mm dia and 2metres long the taper was 200mm ish and the flywheel weighed 1500 kg, we put the shaft vertical and the flywheel on top, bit of a job getting enough men to actually turn the flywheel but we used a little oil with the grinding paste to actually get it to move, it worked though ended up with a perfect matched finish.one fix is to make sure the centre is a good fit on the shaft , this being done by applying grinding paste to the taper and grinding the two parts together, just like a valve in a head, then finally assembled with one of the stronger grades of loctite.