I think it's three things - bean counters, space and weight. The bean counters want to shave the cost of every component to the minimum. So as long as it's legal they'll go with the cheapest (which is, not coincidentally, the smallest and lightest). And on a sports bike, the extra space and weight constraints of a proper compressor horn aren't really workable. Even on my KTM which doesn't have a fairing to get in the way, it caused some head-scratching where I would fit the Denali, which isn't massively bigger than OE.Aye, what is it about motorcycle makers that they flog a bike costing the neck end of 20 grand and still fit it with something robbed from a 1960s scooter?
Even my Pan Euro had a fly's fart for a horn... until I bought a pair of twin-tones and shoe-horned them in - the fairings may look spacious but there's very little fresh air left behind them.
New relay and a dedicated feed from the battery and it sounds like a Scania (yes, I know, it weighs about the same as a Scania...)
That was the name of a cat I had in the 1980s. As a tiny kitten he'd blunder about the place going 'meep meep', so he was named Meep until we came up with a better one. We never did. Even after he grew into a seriously chunky ginger Tom.My kids used to call my first Shogun "meep meep"
But I agree - on a Pan or other serious touring metal, it's unforgivable to fit a weedy horn. Any bike needs a decent horn, given the general cluelessness and myopia of most of the people we share road space with. Just last week a female runner very nearly ran straight inunder my wheels when I was on the Falco. She hadn't seen or heard me despite looking in my direction. And that bike has a pair of Akrapovic cans (can't really call them silencers). The sound of approaching thunder alone should have alerted her.
I used to have one of those B & D drills with a hedge cutter attachment, remember them? Someone borrowed it, guess what .... it came back with a lead a foot long & an apology.fixed the lead on my hedge trimmer they cut leads as well as branches a couple of crimped connectors and tape . good as new didn't even blow the fuse or the trip switch
I wouldn't mind betting your mate with the Futura has got a set of Tigcraft exhausts. They are seriously loud and also give a nice performance increase.My mate Mart with the RST Futura has just blown the money he saved by us not being able to go to the Alps, on a new set of underseat pipes the make of which escapes me... but it's gone from stock rumble to anti-aircraft cannon, I can hear it from 3 bikes back through a pair of earplugs and Tracy Chapman .
I've never tried the Falco but I did 2 miles on a Tuono desperately trying to find a gear that didn't go chugga-chugga-chugga, while the guy who owned it nearly pooed himself on the Pan Euro. He flagged me in and said there was no way he could cope with the weight, I said fair enough, I couldn't cope with a litre engine that needed to be kept at stupid RPM to make it work.
Bizarrely, the Futura and the RSV Mille with the same basic engine manage to deliver how I'd expect a big V-twin to - OK, probably have to stir the cogs a bit more than you do on the Honda's V4.
One of the guys is just starting his first season with a 1290 KTM and that thing is just bonkers. It probably needs all the fancy electronics just to get it off the driveway without looping the loop
Big twins don't like very low rpm!
The TRX has a 270° crank and really doesn't like much below 2500-3000 rpm without shaking your teeth out!
I wouldn't mind betting your mate with the Futura has got a set of Tigcraft exhausts. They are seriously loud and also give a nice performance increase.
because firstly I cant be arsed with all the online welding inspectors and secondly although its not top secret stuff my customers dont really want their f-ups plastered all over the web!
I've owned Honda V4s since the late '80s (VFR750, not Pan) and they do spoil you for tractability and throttle response. There's a slight increase in urgency around the 7k mark, but otherwise it's just linear. My only wish is that they'd made a 1000cc VFR based on the original RC24 models, but with better brakes and suspension and no increase in weight. That would have been pretty much the perfect motorbike.Yeah, I think that was the problem; I've had 14 years of the ST's V4 which has a torque curve flatter than Keira Knightley - it'll pull from just above walking pace to death weave in top.
his helmet has one of those hatches so you can take your brain out before you set off
I've owned Honda V4s since the late '80s (VFR750, not Pan) and they do spoil you for tractability and throttle response. There's a slight increase in urgency around the 7k mark, but otherwise it's just linear. My only wish is that they'd made a 1000cc VFR based on the original RC24 models, but with better brakes and suspension and no increase in weight. That would have been pretty much the perfect motorbike.
The VFR 400 was soooooo smooth too!
Real surprising amount of torque for an engine that revs to 14000!
" third rides the Multi 1200 Pike's Peak, with the funky adaptive suspension - which apparently works really well, which is odd for Italian electronics "
Sky Hook I think it's called. I think the bike has an imaginary hook just above it and the suspension tries to stay level with that
What's wrong with increasing the damping of your forks with some EP80 gear oil anyway?