Yep, that's the one.Zeebrugger?
Read something a year or two ago, that's what the German fire brigade do - they might even have done it with one that wasn't even on fire, but had been damaged.I have to ask my Son, he's stationed at Grimsby, they have a lot of specialist chemical firefighting equipment there, he did mention a while back they were getting a wagon with an open tank on the back for dunking the EV into.
Watched the promotional video and quite liked it....some of the highlights below:Why? Some explanation might be good!
I've been told by someone I consider reliable that that's how they are planning on moving suspect electric vehicles off some Scottish islands.
S'funny. I've always thought of Ferry Crossings to be very safe (esp. so after that one that tipped over maybe 40 years back due to not closing the transport deck ramp before leaving dock - forget the name now).
The thought of being stuck on the passenger decks above a hold with many EV's in it - is a different kettle of fish altogether to my mind.
No doubt there will be responses telling me I'm being daft & all unnecessary - but that's my current thinking
Yes we often have to fill in a DGN. Many things are banned from the Channel Tunnel and have to go by ferry.Herald of Free Enterprise, Zeebrugge. 1987. There was also the MS Estonia which sank in the Baltic in 1994. The bow door of that has just been recovered in the last couple of days.
Most of the ferries out here are open deck. Lorries carrying gas, either tankers or bottled, are transported at the back next to the stern ramp. I'm told the fire plan is basically to drop the stern ramp and push it overboard.
There's also a lot of paperwork involved if you want to transport dangerous goods, flares, explosives, shooting supplies and like.
I've seen pics of that in the US. Not the easiest thing to move around in a hurry though, with several tons of water flopping about inside.I have to ask my Son, he's stationed at Grimsby, they have a lot of specialist chemical firefighting equipment there, he did mention a while back they were getting a wagon with an open tank on the back for dunking the EV into.
I suspect fire protection systems on roll on roll of enclosed type ferries may change as EVs become more common as the fire fighting is vastly different to an oil fire from petrol or diesel. You can really just lash loads of water on it either as the free surface effect of the water could roll the ferry just like the Herald of Free Enterprise.Herald of Free Enterprise, Zeebrugge. 1987. There was also the MS Estonia which sank in the Baltic in 1994. The bow door of that has just been recovered in the last couple of days.
Most of the ferries out here are open deck. Lorries carrying gas, either tankers or bottled, are transported at the back next to the stern ramp. I'm told the fire plan is basically to drop the stern ramp and push it overboard.
There's also a lot of paperwork involved if you want to transport dangerous goods, flares, explosives, shooting supplies and like.
Heard about the EV battery "re-cycling" centre that opened in the UK a couple of weeks ago.Call me a tin foil hat wearing hermit that loves ICE if you like but a few things bother me
Would I want to put my family in one or even have it parked close to the house if its that volatile?
The EV fires seem a lot more fierce and destructive to the vehicle and surroundings than ICE, can this stuff be recycled or is it just land fill fodder now its a big contaminated molten blob?
Presumably the fire services are having to invest in different equipment and training at more expense?
If the go to method of dunking the EV in a tank of water regardless of accident severity is it going to increase insurance cost dramatically as presumably its a write off once submerged?
I guess its progress, at least in Lincolnshire were about 10 years behind so Ill watch with interest!
All very valid questions.Call me a tin foil hat wearing hermit that loves ICE if you like but a few things bother me
Would I want to put my family in one or even have it parked close to the house if its that volatile?
The EV fires seem a lot more fierce and destructive to the vehicle and surroundings than ICE, can this stuff be recycled or is it just land fill fodder now its a big contaminated molten blob?
Presumably the fire services are having to invest in different equipment and training at more expense?
If the go to method of dunking the EV in a tank of water regardless of accident severity is it going to increase insurance cost dramatically as presumably its a write off once submerged?
I guess its progress, at least in Lincolnshire were about 10 years behind so Ill watch with interest!
There was a car fire years ago in the Mont Blanc Tunnel (not an EV). The resulting fire and loss of life meant they invoked new rules where only 1-car at a time was allowed to be in transit at a time.I’m surprised that they are allowed on the tunnel, one catching fire there would be a disaster. LPG fuelled vehicles are not able to travel, but I’ve never heard of a problem with them, maybe it’s political, they dare not refuse.
Not just the islands, and not just damaged or suspect EVs.I've been told by someone I consider reliable that that's how they are planning on moving suspect electric vehicles off some Scottish islands.