I used to be involved with supplying, installing & commissioning off-grid electricity systems (genset, inverter-charger & battery pack at the core, but there's the option to add supplementary charge devices (Solar etc).
For the systems to be viable economically as well as providing uninterrupted 24/7 power (without the need to run the genny 24/7) then using the battery to its best advantage (& avoiding its weaknesses) was an essential part of the set-up & process (along with a charging setup to have good longevity).
We found also that other installers & most users - completely failed to grasp the importance of Charging, Charge Rate, Absorption Times, & Discharging & Cycling of the battery pack, focusing instead on the Inverter Power output Rating & pack size.
The bottom line - is that batteries are Far, FAR better at running low-draw loads (relative to pack size) than they are at running high-draw loads at all (even for very short durations).
They also last much better if charged properly (on traction lead-acid this meant typically not more than 15% of Pack AH per hour to attain peak charge voltage, followed by an Absorption period (where charge current is reduced to maintain peak charge voltage) of typically 4-hours (making a typical full cycle take around 8-hours).
Using a setup where we prevented any extended loads (by having the inverter start the genny & synch, ramp the load to genset, then charge instead of discharge) - we could get a pack to last 2-3 days before needing to run a full cycle (& well-maintained packs lasting 10-12 years).
This - is why IMO EV's and the current practices to fast-charge and have high performance - are "playing to the crowd" & looking to make them more appealing..... instead of accepting what batteries work best doing - and working within their best performance envelope.
I'd think that those who home charge (with a charger that charges overnight and at a battery-friendly rate-of-charge), & who then drive them gently & at as light a load as possible - will extract the best from an EV (also why I believe a car like an early no-frills Leaf - is a far better vehicle than a high-powered "M3 for the image-afflicted".
EV's (batteries) are not suited for high performance, high-load applications IMO. The industry ignoring that to Tey to appeal to the Ego of the petrol-head is I think, actually harming the image of the EV, by trying to "prove" its a complete equal & replacement for the ICE, when it is not.
For the systems to be viable economically as well as providing uninterrupted 24/7 power (without the need to run the genny 24/7) then using the battery to its best advantage (& avoiding its weaknesses) was an essential part of the set-up & process (along with a charging setup to have good longevity).
We found also that other installers & most users - completely failed to grasp the importance of Charging, Charge Rate, Absorption Times, & Discharging & Cycling of the battery pack, focusing instead on the Inverter Power output Rating & pack size.
The bottom line - is that batteries are Far, FAR better at running low-draw loads (relative to pack size) than they are at running high-draw loads at all (even for very short durations).
They also last much better if charged properly (on traction lead-acid this meant typically not more than 15% of Pack AH per hour to attain peak charge voltage, followed by an Absorption period (where charge current is reduced to maintain peak charge voltage) of typically 4-hours (making a typical full cycle take around 8-hours).
Using a setup where we prevented any extended loads (by having the inverter start the genny & synch, ramp the load to genset, then charge instead of discharge) - we could get a pack to last 2-3 days before needing to run a full cycle (& well-maintained packs lasting 10-12 years).
This - is why IMO EV's and the current practices to fast-charge and have high performance - are "playing to the crowd" & looking to make them more appealing..... instead of accepting what batteries work best doing - and working within their best performance envelope.
I'd think that those who home charge (with a charger that charges overnight and at a battery-friendly rate-of-charge), & who then drive them gently & at as light a load as possible - will extract the best from an EV (also why I believe a car like an early no-frills Leaf - is a far better vehicle than a high-powered "M3 for the image-afflicted".
EV's (batteries) are not suited for high performance, high-load applications IMO. The industry ignoring that to Tey to appeal to the Ego of the petrol-head is I think, actually harming the image of the EV, by trying to "prove" its a complete equal & replacement for the ICE, when it is not.