WorkshopChris
Member
- Messages
- 5,049
- Location
- South East Essex
I keep looking at this I can't work out what I am missing, the board looks to be multi-layer but if all 6 caps are common to the centre section in the underside photo then should all the caps be orientated to either positive or negative to share this common point?
Might just be me missing something due to meds.
[/QUOTE]I don't think it is just you.... the only way that I can reverse-engineer a PCB circuit diagram is to hold the board in my hand and turn it over and back again, whilst sketching each step.
I would still recommend tracing the AC mains input wires, I'm sure they end up on this board, and then measuring the DC ( hopefully DC ) that is going to get applied to those new capacitors before soldering them in. I would not want to have them go bang again in front of my nose.... but then again, 200 or 300 v DC needs to be respected too.
The originals are 1200uF, are you meaning bump to 2200uF or was the 220uF what you meant?@Hopefuldave ....
Incidentally if you bump them up to 220uF it's a much more common value and the components should be cheaper. ....
@Hopefuldave is correct the centre pads appear to be the common rail between the stacked voltage-sharing caps.
Incidentally if you bump them up to 220uF it's a much more common value and the components should be cheaper. Given it's almost certainly just the smooth for the rectification stage of the inverter it's unlikely to make much of a difference to it's operation.
RS have lots of caps rated >450V which you could replace them with.
My mistake - I looked at the photo and missed the 1... Did think 200uF was a bit of an odd size.The originals are 1200uF, are you meaning bump to 2200uF or was the 220uF what you meant?
In particular, there is a suggestion from Panasonic that out-of-date aluminium electrolytic capacitors need to have the layer of aluminium oxide on the foil "reformed" by applying the rated voltage through a 1K resistor for 30 minutes.