hard as glass
I used to proper fancy Debbie Harry.
Yea ...'Go ahead punk, make my day'... erm...I used to proper fancy Debbie Harry.
Problem "solved"...
DOH!
and, double DOH!!
Yep some idiot uploaded a "handy" bracket for tools on Thingiverse that some bigger idiot decided to decorate his machine with...
Dammit. It also explains the odd issue I had with the nosecone which I thought should have printed ok but didn't.
Same height, same issue.
Anyhow, see JWST thread for updates...
More to follow!
I tried really hard not to laugh.
Sorry.
A radius gauge set...
If you added a (clip on) flat strip, 2.5mm wide, would it be flexible enough effectively to double the resolution of the gauges? Could it be done like a kerf-cut piece of wood, maybe with semi-circular ends to the kerfs to stop cracking?
I wonder if the kit might be made to cover a greater range of sizes with the same number of pieces and in the same size box if it was done in geometric progression rather than arithmetic (10mm to 15mm is 50% change, 100mm to 105mm is 5% change).
I'd guess that when you get to the bigger sizes you'd want longer arcs to be confident of measuring accurately.
That was like Latin to me. LolI was thinking with what you have, if you put the 125 external against the 130 internal, how much daylight would you see? It would be an awful lot less than if you touch the 10 and 15 together. You could CAD it and see over the length of the existing gauge what the difference is, and whether it is significant.
Only being able to decide it is 'somewhere between 10 and 15' might be more worrysome than 'somewhere between 125 and 130'. The geometric series would give you more resolution at the lower end which could assuage your worries, but less at the higher end, which might not increase them.