My Old Landy
Engineering Mayhem
- Messages
- 3,312
- Location
- North Lincs
Where can you buy a second hand EV? If they depreciate at 46% as I have heard, I would buy one
No lynching from me … I respect your insight and opinions and experience. One come back though … don’t assume everyone’s “good ideas” are purely from a financial point of view. I spend a lot each month (and have done for several years) to put my wife and kids in a “warranty” …. For several reasons. And to me although that costa a lot it is a “good idea”
I would still class a private individual leasing a car as a private car, as unless they're also taking a full servicing package, they're still the ones responsible for the maintenance.Not many private buyers of anything sub £80k, most are PCP or some other form of lease. Most company cars are through lease companies, really big companies (or big car users) go direct to the manufacturer, Foxtons for example.
I'd buy an EV if it suited my use...@Ubique I am sorry old mate - but we are gonna get lynched on here!
But is it looking like the only two people who work on theses EV's here - would not buy/own one.
Please/please can the "eco gang" be nice to us
--------
Also remember - us full time/long term car mechanics are not new car buyers or ever will be! We also seen enuf of the sales reptiles to know renting a car on PHP is not a good idea either.
I'd buy an EV if it suited my use...
We're now maintaining quite a few electric cars and vans, and we're not seeing any major problems.
Had a batch of low mileage Vivaro's recently with battery cell voltage issues, which Stellantis are sorting via remote sessions, as it appears to be just a config issue with the BMS. We update the BMS, take a photo of the battery label, raise a support ticket, and they give us a call to plug the computer in so they can do what they need to.
Biggest issue is we've now had an electric Combo sat for over a month, due to the body builders failing to tighten the main 12volt battery lead after they installed their additional loom, which lead to the traction battery getting a poor connection and welding an internal contactor. Stellantis have told us to strip the battery and replace the high voltage junction box, but they can't supply the instructions. All required parts are available, but nobody is willing to open/close the battery without instructions.
That's just a rubbish design on BMWs part.BMW's do this - burn contactors down in safety box (SME) when main battery left to go flat.
Long job on some models as - battery has to come out - get to SME
All the manufacturers I've worked for have 'dealer servicing' as part of the lease T's & C's - often bolting on a service plan to the monthly lease costs. IMO I think it's reasonable as you're only renting the vehicle, it's never yours so it's fair for the owner to stipulate a certain standard of maintenance.I would still class a private individual leasing a car as a private car, as unless they're also taking a full servicing package, they're still the ones responsible for the maintenance.
I would still class a private individual leasing a car as a private car, as unless they're also taking a full servicing package, they're still the ones responsible for the maintenance.
Pretty much - only a Merc. dealer can accept a used Merc. BEV, they couldn't accept a used Toyota BEV for example, even though they have Toyota dealerships in group. The main drivers for this are energy costs, previous production issues worldwide pushing up perceived value and the proposed VED on full electric vehicles. Tesla's artificial 'value' didn't help matters, the company has global presence so I doubt it's just a UK/EU policy.Am I reading that right?
Your company has a stated internal policy to refuse to accept Tesla's plus certain other EV's in part-exchange for another Vehicle?
(Non-brand?? - does that mean any brand other than the Marque your organisation sells/is a vendor for?)
"Due to the downturn in value" - suggests to me that a used EV/PHEV depreciates very heavily?
(If I am reading your post correctly.... then I can't say I'm surprised, but it still doesn't cheer me up to have my expectations confirmed).
Torque is the main driver of tyre wear, the geometry of the vehicle is completely different due to the positioning of the mass (single or twin motors make a difference too), you'll find BEV's have edge wear that would be generally 'abnormal' on ICE vehicles.I would have thought it was mainly the torque?
So.... its heading in a direction (it seems to me) - that if you've bought a "Brand X" EV - that when you want to replace it... that your only trade-in (& therefore ease of change) option .... is to chop it in for another Brand X machine!!Pretty much - only a Merc. dealer can accept a used Merc. BEV, they couldn't accept a used Toyota BEV for example, even though they have Toyota dealerships in group. The main drivers for this are energy costs, previous production issues worldwide pushing up perceived value and the proposed VED on full electric vehicles. Tesla's artificial 'value' didn't help matters, the company has global presence so I doubt it's just a UK/EU policy.
There are some JLR dealers that were only selling the L460 on the proviso that if the buyer wishes to sell the vehicle, it'll only be to a JLR dealer... This was a measure brought in due to production issues because of Covid causing second-hand prices to be inflated above new prices - how well it would stand up in court is a different matter!
What about these batteries?No idea, but the insurers wouldn't cover it if they didn't have confidence in the lifespan of the battery.
I've never heard of Inchcape etc! (Though not surprised there are massive corporations operating behind the already massive brands).A couple of things - not all dealerships of any marque are owned by a single overarching company as far as I'm aware, so you're free to move between Inchcape, Pendragon, Vertu etc. The restriction is (as far as i'm aware) restricted to a company decision by the group I work for - not any manufacturer, and is likely to be only an interim measure until the market sorts it's **** out, but that's not a decision I'll be included in. I don't think it's a restrictive practice as such, just 'the company' limiting it's exposure to vehicles losing value on the forecourt.
There are some JLR dealers that were only selling the L460 on the proviso that if the buyer wishes to sell the vehicle, it'll only be to a JLR dealer... This was a measure brought in due to production issues because of Covid causing second-hand prices to be inflated above new prices - how well it would stand up in court is a different matter!
So.... its heading in a direction (it seems to me) - that if you've bought a "Brand X" EV - that when you want to replace it... that your only trade-in (& therefore ease of change) option .... is to chop it in for another Brand X machine!!
So that means the punter can't "shop around" among marques to either get the best deal - or because he/she wants to change Brand????
Logically, this direction means there's less/no competition to "Brand X" to offer the best possible trade-in price, or the best "cost to change" price to the punter - as the punter is effectively locked-in??
(Yes there would be the option to try to sell privately or to a "we-rip-you-off.com" company to escape to another brand.... but that's likely to result in losing even more money).
The more info that trickles through - the more concerning it becomes, as the less-&-less freedom & options, and the more & more expense..... seems to be what the motorist is facing - while more and more the "rent" (lease) future of cars seems to be the inevitable steered outcome.
After all, who the hell would want to buy a vehicle under those terms and conditions?