not done it yet
Member
- Messages
- 2,542
- Location
- Lincs/cambs/Rutland/Northants
What was her reason for not wanting it plugged in - a cost consideration ?
It is all there. It only needs to be read. It was paragraphed for you.
What was her reason for not wanting it plugged in - a cost consideration ?
Fixed with an injection of fact.... who thinks that all EVs burst into flames while charging.
Because Govts never ever make "silly" policy decisions that raise revenue disproportionately from the less well-off, right?Please, don’t be silly by making statements like that.
A great number of the housing stock is appallingly inefficient, so that will not work - the less well-off won’t be able to improve their homes (because they rent or are in poorer housing). The people with huge efficient houses will be laughing all the way to the bank.
Try again is my advice….
Well that's not at all in the spirit of things. Please rewrite your post immediately focusing on the cost of sweets and coffee at the services, I bought neither sweets, nor coffee. A Welsh pastie each - but she did have an ice cream and a drink. I had a can of Fanta from the cool-box the length of time it took you to get there traveling at milk float pace, 50, 60 and 70 on occasion. I allocated plenty of time. I even had a nap in a layby for an hour, part way along the A40 the number of times you burst into flames, Just another of those conspirational reasons for hating EVs and the fact that your extension lead wasn't long enough to reach from your house to the final destination. Next time, I will park over the road, after offering the occupants a good deal for charging, and let one of the other ladies park on the garage drive. I have an extension lead in the frunk. What irked me was that a decent charger would have been so much faster. Nearly an hour and a half for a tad over 50kWh was abysmal - the other time I charged away from home was a steady full maximum of the 75kW charger, for the duration (about 40kWh).
I don't disagree with this at all and fully recognise that there will always be a need for certain groups, if not all, to have personal transport of some kind, and I'm pretty certain I havent suggested otherwise.That's all very well, but there are parts of this country where personal transport is essential because public is beyond a joke. Getting anywhere for appointments on time is simply a logistically nightmare, and as for getting home at a reasonable time afterwards....well, forget it. And don't come with the "Well, you chose to live there" thing, we've heard it all before. 20:20 hindsight is a great thing.
Being too expensive is a valid argument for an awful lot of people.I don't disagree with this at all and fully recognise that there will always be a need for certain groups, if not all, to have personal transport of some kind, and I'm pretty certain I havent suggested otherwise.
My main point has always been that we should be using the most suitable means of transport available, which for the majority of users, is not a massive diesel powered 4x4.
There will never be a one size fits all solution. Someone who lives in the middle of a city may have no where to charge an EV, but the chances are they are better served with local amenities and public transport.
Likewise someone that lives in the middle of nowhere is unlikely to have access to public transport, but probably has got somewhere to charge an EV.
Ideal solution, better public transport in towns and cities, EV use for rural situations.
Discounting EV on the argument that "I can't charge it because I live in a flat, or because it doesn't burn dinosaurs, or can't currently do a 700 mile round trip without stopping" isn't a solution to our current problems or valid argument in my opinion though.
Because Govts never ever make "silly" policy decisions that raise revenue disproportionately from the less well-off, right?
It ought to be "silly" - but that doesn't make what @dobbslc said to be unfeasible, or that it will not happen.
Not too young no... but its a different world now, so a different environment with less & less concern for the lower-income earners.Are you too young to remember that they tried that trick before. Had to change to Council Tax from Poll Tax, after the uproar after scrapping the age-old ‘rating‘ system. No system will be truly fair - we pay the same for refuse collection as a family of 10, even though there are only two of us (who don’t feed on over-packaged convenience foods and take-aways most days of the week.
BTW, it was pigeon … that posted, not dobbslc. Do try to keep up with the plot.
Likewise, at no point have I suggested that we should all be throwing away our current transport and replacing it with an EV. But if you can afford a 40K 4x4 you can afford a 40k EV too.Being too expensive is a valid argument for an awful lot of people.
its on the cards already.Taxing houses based on efficiency will be next I reckon....seems like an easy step given the ratings are now compulsory.
Fixed with an injection of fact.
Data reveals extent of electric vehicle fires around the UK
Unique data gained by CE Safety has revealed a dramatic increase in fires caused by electric vehicle batteries.cesafety.co.uk
Likewise, at no point have I suggested that we should all be throwing away our current transport and replacing it with an EV. But if you can afford a 40K 4x4 you can afford a 40k EV too.
If your not in the market for a new car, don't buy one, (unless you live in a new low emissions zone, and I think that's as stupid as you probably do for those living there).
But discounting the technology because its currently expensive isn't an argument either. Mobiles, TV's, Fridges, Washing machines, and all the other stuff we take for granted were expensive when they first came out, but mass adoption helps bring costs down and technological improvements.
By the time the ICE engine ban actually comes into force battery tech will have moved on, charging infrastructure will have improved, used vehicles will be more prevelant, and costs will have come down.
So please carry on driving round in your cheaper car, get every mile out of it you can, I certainly am. But when the time comes to replace it, don't discount EV just because it's not suitable for your particular situation today, as that's not a valid argument, and we've got to start sorting out the motoring mess we've created somewhere.
We've only got 6 EVsRead this - Norfolk only had 5 EV fires...
Not any more!We've only got 6 EVs
The link I posted above does, if you can be bothered to scroll down, give a nice pie chart of vehicle type.A kid's battery scooter which has never been test against any recognized standard counts as a "vehicle" in this case. It would be helpful if figures could be differentiated between 2 and 4 wheel vehicles and and also malicious or accidental fires.
CTSI issues warning about e-bike and e-scooter battery fires
www.tradingstandards.uk
I read that. I don't think you read the preceding paragraphThe link I posted above does, if you can be bothered to scroll down, give a nice pie chart of vehicle type.
For those with limited attention span, here it is. (although it should be titled Percentage of fires by vehicle type).
View attachment 405602